Five modern failures broke on funding, not on a bubble. IL&FS in 2018 funded long projects with short borrowing. Yes Bank in 2020 and Credit Suisse in 2023 had their AT1 bonds written down to zero in rescues. Archegos in 2021 hid $160 billion of exposure on $36 billion of capital using swaps. And in 2022 UK pension funds using LDI were solvent but short of cash when gilt yields jumped 160 basis points.
Why it matters: Being right about value does not help if you cannot find the cash in time.
Summary: Five modern failures broke on funding, not on a bubble: IL&FS (2018) funded long projects with short borrowing; Yes Bank (2020) and Credit Suisse (2023) had AT1 bonds written to zero in rescues; Archegos (2021) hid $160 billion of exposure on $36 billion of capital in swaps; UK LDI funds (2022) were solvent but short of cash when gilt yields jumped 160 basis points.
- IL&FS’s group debt exceeded ₹91,000 crore; the RBI’s 2019 response made large non-bank lenders hold a liquidity coverage ratio reaching 100% by December 2024.
- Yes Bank’s ₹8,415 crore of AT1 was written off; SEBI now limits new AT1 issues to institutions in ₹1 crore lots.
- Archegos cost banks at least $10.4 billion, Credit Suisse $5.5 billion of it.
- The Bank of England bought £19.3 billion of gilts when forced sales threatened 4.2 days of normal trading.
- FINMA wrote off about CHF 16 billion of Credit Suisse AT1 while shareholders got CHF 3 billion of UBS shares; a Swiss court ruled it unlawful in 2025.

None of these five was a classic bubble. Each balance sheet worked in calm markets and failed when funding or collateral had to be paid in cash at once. Two turned on Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital: perpetual bonds that count as bank capital because their terms let them be written down or converted into shares when capital falls below a trigger or a supervisor declares a point of non-viability (PONV). They pay a higher coupon for that risk.
IL&FS, 2018: long assets, short funding. Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services funded projects that paid back over 20 to 25 years with borrowings that had to be repaid or rolled over far sooner. Group entities defaulted from July to September 2018 with debt above ₹91,000 crore, about $12.6 billion at ₹72.28 per dollar. On October 1, 2018, the government took control of the board through the National Company Law Tribunal. The IMF later noted that non-bank lenders and mutual funds faced liquidity strains after the default and that mutual funds cut their non-bank commercial paper by over 60%. SEBI let mutual funds move defaulted debt into a segregated portfolio from December 28, 2018, and from November 4, 2019, the RBI required large non-bank lenders to hold a liquidity coverage ratio reaching 100% by December 1, 2024, and capped net cumulative outflow gaps at 10%, 10% and 20% for the 1–7, 8–14 and 15–30 day buckets. Section 8.6: The Rise of Private Credit applies the lesson to private credit.
Yes Bank, 2020: AT1 sold like a deposit. On March 5, 2020, Yes Bank was placed under a moratorium, with withdrawals capped at ₹50,000, and the RBI superseded its board, citing failure to raise capital, loan losses, downgrades, deposit withdrawals and “serious governance issues.” State Bank of India bought up to 49% for ₹7,250 crore (about $0.97 billion) at ₹10 a share, and seven other lenders joined it: ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bandhan Bank, Federal Bank and IDFC First Bank. The administrator wrote ₹8,415 crore (about $1.13 billion at ₹74.55) of AT1 bonds to zero. SEBI found that 1,346 individuals had bought ₹679 crore of them, 8.1% of the total, some after closing fixed deposits, without being told the risks, and fined the bank ₹25 crore in April 2021. Since October 2020 only qualified institutional buyers may subscribe to new AT1 issues, in lots of at least ₹1 crore. The Bombay High Court quashed the write-down on January 20, 2023; the Supreme Court stayed that ruling and reserved judgment on February 26, 2026.
Archegos, 2021: leverage nobody saw whole. Section 8.7: Family Offices explains the mechanism. According to the SEC, the family office grew from about $1.5 billion of capital and $10 billion of exposure to more than $36 billion and $160 billion, 160 ÷ 36 = 4.4× gross leverage, mostly through total return swaps spread across prime brokers. When its stocks fell in late March 2021 and margin calls went unmet, banks disclosed losses of at least $10.4 billion within a month, including Credit Suisse $5.5 billion and Nomura $2.9 billion. Its founder was convicted in July 2024 and sentenced to 18 years; in July 2023 the Federal Reserve fined UBS $268.5 million and the Prudential Regulation Authority fined Credit Suisse £87 million.
UK LDI, 2022: hedged on value, short of cash. Section 5.6: VaR’s Limitations — What It Doesn’t Capture works the numbers for a leveraged liability-driven investment fund, and Volume III’s Part 10 traces the episode through pension balance sheets. After the September 23, 2022, Growth Plan the 30-year gilt yield rose 160 basis points in a few days; the largest daily rise since 2000 had been 29. LDI strategies holding over £1 trillion faced collateral calls, and the Bank of England expected forced sales of at least £50 billion against about £12 billion of daily trading. It bought £19.3 billion of gilts between September 28 and October 14 and had sold them by January 12, 2023. Scheme liabilities had fallen with gilt prices, so the problem was cash, not solvency; schemes had to raise collateral within days. In March 2023 the Financial Policy Committee set a minimum resilience of about 250 basis points.
Credit Suisse, 2023: a run on a bank that met its capital rules. Credit Suisse lost CHF 7.3 billion in 2022 and had net asset outflows of CHF 110.5 billion in the fourth quarter. After the March 2023 US bank failures, on March 19 UBS agreed to buy it for CHF 3 billion in UBS shares, backed by a CHF 9 billion federal loss guarantee and two Swiss National Bank liquidity facilities of up to CHF 100 billion each. Because that was “extraordinary government support,” FINMA ordered about CHF 16 billion of AT1 bonds written to zero under their “Viability Event” clause and an emergency ordinance, while Tier 2 bonds were not written down. The Bank of England said the next day that in the UK “AT1 instruments rank ahead of CET1.” On October 1, 2025, the Federal Administrative Court ruled the write-down unlawful, finding the bank had met its capital requirements; FINMA appealed. In June 2025 the Federal Council proposed full deduction of foreign subsidiaries from the parent’s Common Equity Tier 1, a senior managers regime and fining powers for FINMA.
An illustrative bank holds $5 billion of Common Equity Tier 1, $2 billion of AT1 and $3 billion of Tier 2 beneath $90 billion of deposits and senior debt, and loses $6 billion.
| Holder | Standard order (equity first) | AT1 written off first |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholders ($5bn) | −$5bn (100%) | −$4bn (80%) |
| AT1 ($2bn) | −$1bn (50%) | −$2bn (100%) |
| Tier 2 and senior | $0 | $0 |
The total is $5bn + $1bn = $4bn + $2bn = $6bn either way; only the allocation moves, and for the AT1 holder it doubles the loss from 50% to 100%. Read the trigger clause, not the ranking chart.
Before owning any leveraged or hybrid position, answer three questions. Who can demand cash from you, and how fast? How many days of normal market volume would you need to raise it by selling? Which clause can wipe you out ahead of holders you think rank below you? If a week’s cash calls could exceed your liquid assets, or a regulator’s judgment rather than a number you can track triggers the wipe-out, cut the size or demand a yield that pays for a total loss. The rule matters less for unleveraged holdings you never need to sell.
Buying an AT1 bond as if it were a deposit or a senior bond. Yes Bank’s ₹8,415 crore and Credit Suisse’s roughly CHF 16 billion of AT1 went to zero while depositors were protected, and Credit Suisse’s shareholders still received CHF 3 billion of UBS shares. Assume a total loss in any rescue and size the holding so that a 100% loss is survivable.
What are AT1 bonds?
Perpetual bonds banks issue to meet part of their capital requirement. They pay a higher coupon because the bank can skip coupons and the bonds can be written down or converted into equity if capital falls below a trigger or a regulator declares the bank non-viable.
Why were Credit Suisse’s AT1 bonds written off while shareholders got paid?
The bonds’ terms allowed a full write-down once the bank received extraordinary government support, and an emergency ordinance authorized FINMA to order it. About CHF 16 billion was written off on March 19, 2023, while shareholders received CHF 3 billion of UBS shares. A Swiss court ruled the write-down unlawful in October 2025; FINMA appealed.
What caused the UK gilt crisis in 2022?
Pension schemes had hedged with leveraged gilt positions through LDI funds. When 30-year yields rose 160 basis points in days after the September 23, 2022, Growth Plan, the funds faced collateral calls they could meet only by selling gilts, pushing yields higher until the Bank of England bought £19.3 billion.
IL&FS, Yes Bank, Archegos, UK LDI funds and Credit Suisse failed when funding or collateral had to be paid in cash at once, not because of a classic bubble. Two of them wrote AT1 bonds to zero, so the trigger clause, not the ranking chart, decides what such an investor gets back.
Six questions on this chapter. Decide on your answer first, then click “Reveal Answer.”
1. Archegos had about $160 billion of exposure on $36 billion of capital. What fall in its book would erase the capital?
- About 10.4%
- About 4.4%
- About 36.0%
- About 22.5%
Reveal Answer
Answer: D. Leverage is 160 ÷ 36 = 4.4×, so the wipe-out fall is 36 ÷ 160 = 22.5%.
2. A bank with $5 billion of CET1 and $2 billion of AT1 loses $6 billion. Under the standard order, what share of the AT1 is lost?
- 0%
- 20%
- 50%
- 100%
Reveal Answer
Answer: C. Equity absorbs the first $5 billion, leaving $1 billion for AT1: 1 ÷ 2 = 50%.
3. What did SEBI change for AT1 bonds in October 2020 after Yes Bank?
- A ban on new AT1 bonds by banks
- New issues for institutions only
- A cap on AT1 coupons at the repo rate
- A principal guarantee for individuals
Reveal Answer
Answer: B. The circular limited primary subscription to QIBs with a minimum allotment and trading lot of ₹1 crore.
4. Why did UK LDI funds need cash in September 2022 even though pension schemes were mostly solvent?
- Collateral calls came due within days
- Pension liabilities rose as yields climbed
- Regulators raised capital rules overnight
- Members withdrew pensions in a run
Reveal Answer
Answer: A. Liabilities fell with gilt prices, but hedge losses had to be paid in cash at once.
5. Worked problem: Yes Bank wrote off ₹8,415 crore of AT1 bonds. An investor held 2% of them. What was lost?
Reveal Answer
Answer: 2% × ₹8,415 crore = ₹168.3 crore.
6. Worked problem: IL&FS had group debt above ₹91,000 crore. If assets could cover 60 paise per rupee, what shortfall is that?
Reveal Answer
Answer: 40% × ₹91,000 crore = ₹36,400 crore.
- RBI, Liquidity Risk Management Framework for NBFCs, November 4, 2019 — LCR and mismatch caps
- SEC press release 2022-70, Archegos charges — Capital and exposure figures
- Bank of England, letter from Sir Jon Cunliffe on LDI, October 5, 2022 — Gilt moves, £50 billion forced sales
- FRED EXINUS
- RBI, March 5, 2020
- Federal Reserve Board – Federal Reserve Board announces a consent order and a $268.5 million fine with UBS Gro (Federal Reserve)
